|
It was reported, during a ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy, when attempting to use an ncircle tipless stone extractor it was found to be "faulty" and not working.It was noted that "unexpected or prolonged care was required." there was no serious harm reported.At this time, no adverse effects or additional procedures for the patient were reported due to this occurrence.Additional information regarding the event and patient outcome has been requested but is currently unavailable.
|
|
Correction: health effect - impact code (annex f) investigation ¿ evaluation it was reported, during a ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy, when attempting to use an ncircle tipless stone extractor it was found to be "faulty" and not working.It was noted that "unexpected or prolonged care was required." there was no serious harm reported.At this time, no adverse effects or additional procedures for the patient were reported due to this occurrence.Reviews of documentation including the complaint history, device history record (dhr), quality control procedures, manufacturing instructions (mi), and instructions for use (ifu), as well as a visual inspection and functional test of the returned device, were conducted during the investigation.One device was returned to cook for evaluation.The handle was in closed position.The handle does actuate the basket formation.The reported failure could not be duplicated.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the device history record showed no discrepancies related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records showed no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that the device was manufactured to specification and that there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in the field.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The ifu packaged with the device does not contain information relevant to the reported event.Based on the information provided, inspection of the returned device, and the results of the investigation, the cause for the issue could not be established.The returned device's basket formation did actuate.The reported failure could not be duplicated.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute toa death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|