• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: INSTITUT STRAUMANN AG BL, Ø 3.3 MM NC, SLACTIVE 12 MM; ENDOSSEOUS DENTAL IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

INSTITUT STRAUMANN AG BL, Ø 3.3 MM NC, SLACTIVE 12 MM; ENDOSSEOUS DENTAL IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 021.2112
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/05/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The batch number could not be verified due to incomplete or missing information and / or product from the customer.Our manufacturing q-system assures that production and process controls are in place to ensure that batches confirm to the applicable specifications before they are distributed.The fracture of a dental implant is a known long-term complication of endosseous dental implants.The manufacturers trend analysis confirms that the reported implant fracture rate associated with its dental implants is low and remains consistent with the experience as documented in the literature.There are different reasons why implants break and this problem has been illuminated by various authors (e.G.Maeglin 1988, beumer 1989, tetsch 1991, worthington 1992).Beumer and lewis 1989 report the following causes: a) production / design flaws.B) inadequate fitting of the suprastructure.C) occlusal overload.D) bruxism.E) bone resorption around the implants.F) insufficient axle alignment of the implants.G) trauma.H) biomechanical causes.I) design of the suprastructure.
 
Event or Problem Description
The clinician reports the implant was inserted on (b)(6) 2014 in fdi 24.On (b)(6) 2025, fracture of the implant was verified.No product was returned to the manufacturer.There were no patient operative or post-operative complications reported.
 
Event or Problem Description
The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2014 in fdi 24.On (b)(6) 2025, fracture of the implant was verified.The device was forwarded to the manufacturer.There were no patient operative or post-operative complications reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The batch number could not be verified due to incomplete or missing information and / or product from the customer.Our manufacturing q-system assures that production and process controls are in place to ensure that batches confirm to the applicable specifications before they are distributed.The fracture of a dental implant is a known long-term complication of endosseous dental implants.The manufacturers trend analysis confirms that the reported implant fracture rate associated with its dental implants is low and remains consistent with the experience as documented in the literature.There are different reasons why implants break and this problem has been illuminated by various authors (e.G.Maeglin 1988, beumer 1989, tetsch 1991, worthington 1992).Beumer and lewis 1989 report the following causes: a) production / design flaws.B) inadequate fitting of the suprastructure.C) occlusal overload.D) bruxism.E) bone resorption around the implants.F) insufficient axle alignment of the implants.G) trauma.H) biomechanical causes.I) design of the suprastructure.Non-fatal serious injury or device malfunction stored due to covid 19 pandemic in accordance with fda guidance "postmarketing adverse event reporting for medical products and dietary supplements during a pandemic" published may 2020.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The batch number could be verified.Our manufacturing q-system assures, that production and process controls are in place to ensure that batches confirm to the applicable specifications before they are distributed.The fracture of a dental implant is a known long-term complication of endosseous dental implants.The manufacturers trend analysis confirms that the reported implant fracture rate associated with its dental implants is low and remains consistent with the experience as documented in the literature.There are different reasons why implants break and this problem has been illuminated by various authors (e.G.Maeglin 1988, beumer 1989, tetsch 1991, worthington 1992).Beumer and lewis 1989 report the following causes: a) production / design flaws b) inadequate fitting of the suprastructure c) occlusal overload d) bruxism e) bone resorption around the implants f) insufficient axle alignment of the implants g) trauma h) biomechanical causes i) design of the suprastructure non-fatal serious injury or device malfunction stored due to covid 19 pandemic in accordance with fda guidance "postmarketing adverse event reporting for medical products and dietary supplements during a pandemic" published may 2020.
 
Event or Problem Description
The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2014 in the patient's mouth.On (b)(6) 2025, fracture of the implant was verified.The device was forwarded to the manufacturer.There were no patient operative or post-operative complications reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BL, Ø 3.3 MM NC, SLACTIVE 12 MM
Common Device Name
ENDOSSEOUS DENTAL IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
INSTITUT STRAUMANN AG
peter merian-weg 12
basel 04002
SZ  04002
Manufacturer (Section G)
INSTITUT STRAUMANN AG
peter merian-weg 12
basel 04002
SZ   04002
Manufacturer Contact
jennifer jackson
60 minuteman road
andover, MA 01810
9787472509
MDR Report Key24084085
Report Number0009613348-2026-000900
Device Sequence Number9683891
Product Code DZE
UDI-Device Identifier07630031706362
UDI-Public07630031706362
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryNO
PMA/510(K) Number
K062129
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2014
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Dentist
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/02/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2018
Device Catalogue Number021.2112
Device Lot NumberFN175
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date04/02/2026
Event Location Other
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Not provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/15/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/23/2026
04/02/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/30/2013
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age50 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-