• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Visual Disturbances (2140)
Date of Event 09/25/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a4, a5 and a6: unknown, information was requested but not provided.Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.An attempt has been made to obtain missing information; however, the information has not been provided.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a preloaded monofocal intraocular lens (iol) was explanted in a secondary surgical procedure from a patient¿s right eye because of photopsia, which persisted for 3.5 months.The issue was noted during the patient's site visit.It is unknown if the symptoms impacted patient's daily activities.A non-johnson & johnson lens of +18.75 diopter was implanted.The incision was enlarged, but no unplanned vitrectomy or sutures were required.It is unknown if there was a delay in procedure.It is unknown whether the patient required additional medical attention or medication beyond the standard of care; however, the patient has fully recovered.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: the following field was updated based on the additional information received: section b5: based on the additional information received, it is unknown if there was a patient injury such as capsule tear.Section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: jan 14, 2026.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification was performed on the suspect product and found the lens was cut in half, coated in viscoelastic residue, and with the lens halves stuck together.The lens halves were cleaned and unstuck revealing no further issues.The physical characteristics of the received lens were confirmed to match that of a dib00 model lens.No further evaluation was performed.No issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issues reported were identified during product evaluation.The ¿lens cut¿ observed during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: based on the investigation, no malfunction or product deficiency was identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key24104125
Report Number3012236936-2026-000019
Device Sequence Number10239222
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731745
UDI-Public(01)05050474731745(17)280514
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOR
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/23/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0195
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/23/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/30/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/16/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/23/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/14/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-