• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ENDOTAK RELIANCE G; IMPLANTABLE LEAD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ENDOTAK RELIANCE G; IMPLANTABLE LEAD Back to Search Results
Model Number 0285
Medical Device Problem Codes Fracture (1260); High impedance (1291); High Capture Threshold (3266)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/22/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This product was manufactured before the implementation of the udi regulation, so the complete udi is unavailable.Applicable us product data has been included in this report.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this right ventricular (rv) lead exhibited high impedance and high pacing threshold outputs due to lead fracture or breakage.This rv lead was explanted, replaced with a different model and returned for analysis.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This product was manufactured before the implementation of the udi regulation, so the complete udi is unavailable.Applicable us product data has been included in this report.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this right ventricular (rv) lead exhibited high impedance and high pacing threshold outputs due to lead fracture or breakage.This rv lead was explanted, replaced with a different model and returned for analysis.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information indicates that the lead fracture was confirmed through fluoroscopy and device-based testing.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation of the available information or data determined that the observed gradual rise in low-voltage shock impedance (lvsi) measurements was likely associated with calcification, as there was no conclusive evidence of compromised physical or electrical integrity of the lead.This condition may develop over time and can be reflected in a gradual and sustained increase in shock impedance measurements.Boston scientific issued a field safety notice to physicians in july 2025 regarding the potential for reliance defibrillation leads with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (eptfe) coating to exhibit a pattern of gradually increasing lvsi measurements due to calcification, which may result in elevated high-voltage shock impedance (hvsi) measurements and reduced shock efficacy.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of fracture was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of cause traced to device design based on the reported allegation of a gradual rise of shock impedance in a reliance lead system.This performance issue is consistent with capa-8367, which determined this to be a design issue.This product was manufactured before the implementation of the udi regulation, so the complete udi is unavailable.Applicable us product data has been included in this report.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this right ventricular (rv) lead exhibited high impedance and high pacing threshold outputs due to lead fracture or breakage.This rv lead was explanted, replaced with a different model and returned for analysis.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information indicates that the lead fracture was confirmed through fluoroscopy and device-based testing.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDOTAK RELIANCE G
Common Device Name
IMPLANTABLE LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
road 698, lot no. 12
dorado PR 00646 -260
*   00646-2602
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key24104817
Report Number2124215-2026-03328
Device Sequence Number10243776
Product Code NVY
UDI-Device Identifier00802526431401
UDI-Public(01)00802526431401(17)131026
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter StateAZ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P910073
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2013
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/30/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date10/26/2013
Device Model Number0285
Device Catalogue Number0285
Device Lot Number102769
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/09/2026
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/22/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/21/2026
04/28/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/16/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/09/2026
04/30/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/26/2011
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-