| Model Number |
G156 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Pacing Problem (1439); Failure to Convert Rhythm (1540); Defibrillation/Stimulation Problem (1573); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Ventricular Fibrillation (2130); Shock from Patient Lead(s) (3162)
|
| Date of Event |
12/29/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) delivered three rounds of inappropriate anti-tachycardia pacing (atp) and eight inappropriate shock(s) due to an episode of atrial arrhythmia.Device experienced therapy exhaustion.The device accelerated the rhythm to ventricular fibrillation (vf) and therapy failed to convert.This device was "[ponga resolution si lo tiene y si omita]".The device remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) delivered three rounds of inappropriate anti-tachycardia pacing (atp) and eight inappropriate shock(s) due to an episode of atrial arrhythmia.Device experienced therapy exhaustion.The device accelerated the rhythm to ventricular fibrillation (vf) and therapy failed to convert.The device remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Corrected fields: b5.Describe event or problem.This product investigation is still in progress.This report will be updated when product investigation is complete.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) delivered three rounds of inappropriate anti-tachycardia pacing (atp) and eight inappropriate shock(s) due to an episode of atrial arrhythmia.Device experienced therapy exhaustion.The device accelerated the rhythm to ventricular fibrillation (vf) and therapy failed to convert.The device remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of atp delivered when not required was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of known inherent risk of device.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|