| Model Number |
SIG30CTAVM |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Failure to Form Staple (2579); Failure to Cut (2587)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Tissue Breakdown (2681)
|
| Date of Event |
01/16/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
D10 concomitant product: sigpshell, sig power sigpshell control shell, (lot # n5h1820y) medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, during a procedure, when using the reload on the upper lobe pulmonary artery, the staples fired but the device did not cut the tissue.The proximal staple line did not seal.To resolve the issue, several blue clips from a different manufacturer were applied to reinforce, artery divided using device.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: d9, g3, h3, h6 h3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device and a photo were available for evaluation.Func tional testing found that the reload was loaded into a representative instrument.The reload interlock was tested and found to function properly.The interlock was overridden and the reload was applied to test media.All remaining staples were placed properly and test media was cleanly transected.The interlock was tested and found to function properly.It was reported that the device did not cut.The reported issue was confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.It was also reported that there was staple formation.The reported issue could not be confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.This issue may occur when the firing handle has not been completely cycled.If the instrument return knobs are retracted at any point once the firing cycle has begun, the reload will engage into safety interlock and prevent further attempts to fire by ceasing the placement of staples and tissue transection and prevent patient harm.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: failure to completely fire the reload will result in an incomplete cut and/or incomplete staple formation, which may result in poor hemostasis and/or leakage.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|