| Model Number |
250 (+ 19.5 D) |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
| Date of Event |
12/04/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Event occurred in china.Damaged haptic after implantation.The cause was that an insufficient amount of viscoelastic was injected during surgery, which resulted in the haptic being clamped before the lens implantation.The surgeon then forcibly pushed the lens forward, causing the injector tip to fracture.After discovering the broken haptic, the surgeon removed the lens and implanted a new one.Currently, the patient has not experienced any adverse conditions postoperatively.Product replaced with another lens immediately during surgery; patient health not impacted; iol was explanted on (b)(6) 2025.Problem code: a0414 - material split, cut or torn.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This initial emdr is being submitted to the fda for a reportable event that occurred outside the usa.Haptic damage is indicated as a potential malfunction related to the iol, as stated under the warnings section of the product's instructions for use (ifu).Regarding section h6 - manufacturer's codes for: type of investigation, findings, and conclusion are pending completion of product investigation.Once the product investigation is completed, a follow-up report will be submitted to fda which will include the manufacturer's codes for type of investigation, findings, and conclusion.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report #1 emdr is being submitted to fda for a reportable event that occurred outside the usa.The report includes corrected and additional information not available/included in the initial report.Corrected information: b2 - corrected to no congenital anomaly/birth defect.This outcome did not occur and was selected in error.H3 - corrected to yes.H6 - updated codes for manufacturer's investigation: type; findings; and conclusion.Additional information: g6 - type of report - noted as follow-up #1.H2 - type of follow-up - noted for correction and additional information.The product was returned to the manufacturer.The investigation was conducted, with the methods and results as noted below.Appearance check result was consistent to reported information, but the customer cannot confirm which haptic damaged.No abnormalities were found in production and inspection records of the product (serial no.: (b)(6); model: "250").We also confirmed there were no abnormalities on the "loop pull strength test" of the material lot.("tode-g115-004").We also found "damaged optic and rod deformed".The dye test result showed the injector tip was properly coated.The lens release test result showed that the re-installed new iol could be released out of the returned cartridge/tip without any problems.The exact root cause was not determined.However, based on the available information and our investigation, we believe this event was not caused by our product quality.A review of the most recent complaint trending data indicates that no significant trends have been identified at this time and no capa is required as part of the product evaluation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|