|
Tw (b)(4).Updated sections: b4, d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6, h11.Corrected sections: d4 (version of model#; catalog#).The investigation has been started since the complaint was received, the following contents have been conducted: 1.Device historical record review: dhr of the reported batch is reviewed, there¿s no deficiency identified from production relevant to the ¿vacuum tubing disconnected¿ issue prior to this complaint.All the products had been performed 100% function test and inspection during production.They all passed the function test, which demonstrates the vacuum tubing is normal without damage or break.2.Trend review: in the 12 months from (b)(6) 2025 to (b)(6) 2025 (date of event), the occurrence rate for the reported issue is found to be (b)(4) for acrobat-i c-om-10000/z/s, which is under anticipated occurrence rate.3.Returned device evaluation: 1).A visual inspection was conducted.Some blood marks were observed.The barb detached from baffle and so that the vacuum tubing dropped.The reported issue ¿vacuum tubing disconnected¿ was confirmed on the returned device.2).The device was furtherly disassembled for inspection of relevant components.Inspected the defective component under the microscope, it was observed that the bonding surfaces of barb and baffle were distributed with the cured glue, and the cured glue showed signs of tearing.3).Production record data was reviewed for further investigation.At vacuum tubing and barb assembly station, to test and monitor the baffle subassembly pull force, there has sampling baffle pull test at the beginning and at the end of each lot.After the device assembly is completed, there has device verification inspection, including 100% vacuum line leak test for each device.Check these test data, all devices met all product specifications upon leaving the factory.Based on the test data and glue distribution and tearing marks on the returned device, maquet suzhou engineer reckoned the most possible root cause is that there have external forces acting on the vacuum tubing connected with the barb, finally resulting in the barb detached from baffle.The failure mode addressed in the risk file and is operating within its risk profile.The ifu addresses the reported failure.The device met all product specifications upon leaving the factory.There were no ncrs identified which could cause or contribute to the reported failure.The investigation does not indicate that the device was inadvertently released as non-conforming or an adulterated product or was a counterfeit.The complaint history review did not identify an adverse trend.There were no consequences or impacts to the patient.The trending will be monitored continuously.
|