|
SHOCKWAVE MEDICAL, INC. SHOCKWAVE IVL SYSTEM WITH THE SHOCKWAVE C2 CORONARY IVL CATHETER
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
C2IVL3012 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Perforation of Vessels (2135)
|
| Date of Event |
12/18/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Death
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a shockwave c2 coronary intravascular lithotripsy (ivl) catheter was used during an emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (pci) with impella circulatory support procedure to treat a patient that went into cardiogenic shock due to severe aortic stenosis.Angiography identified chronic total occlusions of the right coronary artery (rca) and left circumflex artery with circumferential, heavily calcified lesions.Two (2) shockwave c2 ivl catheters were advanced under guide extension catheter support to attempt lesion modification, however, both ivl catheters ruptured during use.The first ivl catheter balloon ruptured after 10 pulses and the second ivl catheter (mdr#: 3015053858-2026-00006) ruptured after 20 pulses; a third ivl catheter (mdr#: 3015053858-2026-00007) delivered 40 pulses to achieve dilatation and complete the procedure.Post[?]ivl imaging revealed multiple cracks in the treated segment.A kizashi cutting balloon was then inflated to 20 atm, at which time a vessel perforation was observed.A papyrus covered stent was deployed for hemostasis but fractured, so an additional overlapping covered stent was placed, where successful hemostasis was achieved.Drainage was attempted, during which the patient's blood pressure fell to zero.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ecmo) was recommended by the hospital, but the family declined life sustaining support.The patient died in the intensive care unit (icu) that day.The physician noted that the two ivl catheter ruptures could have contributed to vessel injury, but post ivl imaging and angiography did not show definitive cause.The cause of death remains unknown.This report is for the 1st ivl catheter device used.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device referenced in this report is anticipated to be returned but has not yet been received at shockwave medical, inc.Therefore, a physical examination has not been performed.After the device is received and investigation is completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.Shockwave medical has controls in place to ensure devices are built to approved procedures and meet lot release acceptance criteria prior to being distributed.A review of the manufacturing and test documentation for subject lot does not reveal any issues with the manufacturing of the device.The device passed all of shockwave medical, inc.Acceptance criteria prior to shipping.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The subject device was returned for investigation and inspected.The ivl device successfully delivered under 10 pulses, so this is not an out-of-the-box failure.Balloon ruptures are a known failure mode with a low probability of occurrence.Contributing factors include patient calcium, damage caused when the balloon wall comes into close contact with the device emitters, likely causes include (a) an irregular calcium lesion capable of compressing the balloon wall into close proximity with the emitter(s) and/or (b) an incompletely inflated balloon.The shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (ivl) system with the shockwave c2 coronary ivl catheter generates acoustic pressure pulses within the target treatment site, disrupting calcium within the lesion allowing subsequent dilatation of a coronary artery stenosis using low balloon pressure not to exceed 4 atm during ivl treatment, and 6 atm for post dilatation.The pressure used for the ivl balloon catheter is much lower than other balloon catheters used in percutaneous coronary intervention (pci), thus the risk associated with loss of balloon pressure during ivl catheter use is negligible.The associated patient risk for this failure mode is low and adequately captured in swmi's risk documentation.Shockwave associate chief medical officer (cmo) reviewed the angiographic and ivus imaging associated with the case.The review confirmed a large perforation and the presence of a severely calcified lesion in the left main artery extending into the left anterior descending artery (lad).Lesion preparation involved multiple devices, including percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (ptca) balloons, intravascular lithotripsy (ivl), and a kizashi cutting balloon.The associate cmo determined that the most probable cause of the perforation was the kizashi cutting balloon.While less likely, the cmo indicated that one of the three ivl balloons used could have caused a vessel injury that may have been exacerbated by subsequent therapies.It was highlighted that multiple interventional measures were taken to manage the perforation, including prolonged balloon inflation and deployment of a covered stent.Despite these interventions, the patient developed hemodynamic instability.The treating team recommended escalation to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ecmo) for patient support.The patient's family declined further escalation of care, and the patient subsequently expired.Based on the information and imaging provided, the exact cause of the perforation and subsequent death could not be definitively determined based on the information available.Shockwave medical safety and medical affairs determined the perforation as definitely procedure related and possibly related to the ivl devices.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|