|
H11: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.D2b (dqy; lit).Section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
On (b)(6) 2025, a patient underwent a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) procedure using the dorado balloon catheter.During the procedure, the balloon catheter allegedly torn and the base catheter covering stripped away from the balloon.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported as unknown.Investigation summary: one dorado pta balloon catheter returned for evaluation.Upon visual inspection, the device was noted to be loaded with an unknown brand gw.A complete circumferential break was noted to the catheter shaft at the proximal glue joint.The inflation lumens were noted to be exposed from the catheter.The balloon was returned attached.Bunching was noted throughout the balloon, and the distal tip of the balloon was noted to be prolapsed.Peeled pebax were noted to the proximal end of the balloon.Fiber disturbance and unraveling were noted to the distal portion of the balloon.Blood residue was observed on the catheter shaft and throughout the balloon.Microscopic analysis was performed on the anomalies noted on the catheter.No functional testing was performed due to the condition of the device returned.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the identified break as complete circumferential break was noted to the catheter shaft at the proximal glue joint.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported balloon rupture as functional testing could not be performed due to the condition of the device returned.The investigation is unconfirmed for the reported detachment as no detachment was found on the returned device and balloon was returned attached.The investigation is confirmed for the identified peeled pebax and unraveling as peeled pebax were noted to the proximal end of the balloon and unraveling were noted to the distal portion of the balloon.A definitive root cause for the reported balloon rupture, detachment, identified break, peeled pebax and unraveling could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.B5, d2b (dqy; lit), g3, h6 (device, component, result, conclusion) section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|