• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV AVALUS ULTRA BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV AVALUS ULTRA BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 400U25
Medical Device Problem Codes Incomplete Coaptation (2507); Intravalvular regurgitation (4068)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/12/2026
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received information that during the implant of this 25mm aortic bioprosthetic valve, it was explanted and replaced with another manufacturers product.The reason for the replacement was reported as after implant, a central jet causing aortic insufficiency was identified with poor coaptation.It was further noted that additional sutures were added, however the central jet and aortic insufficiency continued, therefore the valve was replaced.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic's quality laboratory, visual examination revealed that the valve exhibited discoloration consistent with blood contact.All leaflets were in a semi-closed position with a gap between their free margins.All leaflets were observed intact.Thrombus was observed on the commissures.All commissures and posts appeared intact.Conclusion: the investigation is in progress.A supplemental report will be submitted after completion of the investigation.H3: device evaluated? updated h6: updated the codes medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic's quality laboratory, visual examination revealed that the valve exhibited discoloration consistent with blood contact.The valve appeared to have a segment of the sewing cuff inverted.A remnant of a green multifilament suture remains attached to the sewing ring.Small needle holes observed along the sewing cuff show placement of implantation sutures; also found on the sewing cuff were tears.On top of post 2, there was a tear observed.These findings may be associated with contact from a sharp instrument during the explant procedure.All leaflets were in a semi-closed position with a gap between their free margins.All leaflets were observed intact.All commissures and posts appeared intact.Conclusion: the investigation is in progress.A supplemental report will be submitted after completion of the investigation.Corrected the analysis.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AVALUS ULTRA BIOPROSTHESIS
Common Device Name
REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX  22210
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX   22210
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key24180283
Report Number9617601-2026-00573
Device Sequence Number15996805
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00763000647056
UDI-Public(01)00763000647056(17)280721(20)01
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P170006
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2026
Device Explanted Year2026
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/22/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number400U25
Device Catalogue Number400U25
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/20/2026
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/12/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/24/2026
04/22/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/26/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/19/2026
05/22/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/22/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Life Threatening;
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight100 KG
-
-