• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV CONCERTO NYLON; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV CONCERTO NYLON; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number NV-3-8-HELIX
Medical Device Problem Codes Separation Failure (2547); Material Deformation (2976); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/23/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: instant detacher product id unk-nv-ap-id (lot: unknown);  concerto helix coil product id nv-3-8-helix (b)(6);  medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received a report that two concerto helix coils would not deploy.It was also reported that there was no alleged product issue.The product was replaced with a different model medtronic coil to complete the procedure.No patient symptoms or complications were associated with this event.The patient was undergoing coil embolization surgery for treatment of an endoleak.It was noted the patient's blood flow was normal and vessel tortuosity was moderate.The reported device and any accessory devices were prepared as indicated in the instructions for use (ifu).Ancillary devices included a merit maestro microcatheter.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information was received stating that the endoleak was located as a post-evar type ii endoleak.The coils did not deploy because resistance was felt when attempting to insert them into the microcatheter.Kinking was found after a few attempts.Prior to coil non-detachment, resistance was encountered when attempting to insert the coil into the microcatheter.After removal from the patient, kinking was observed on the pushwire.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3 product analysis: drawing(s) referenced: n/a as found condition: the concerto device was returned for analysis within a shipping box, within a sealed plastic biohazard pouch and within an introducer sheath.The unknown merit maestro micro catheter used during the event was not returned for analysis.Visual inspection/damage location details: the actuator interface was found securely attached to the coupler tube.No evidence of detachment using an instant detacher was observed at this location.The pusher three tack welds were found broken with the release wire retracted.The concerto pusher was found bent at ~4.0cm from the proximal end and found kinked at ~8.2cm and ~45.5cm from the proximal end.The coin was found retracted out of the lumen stop.The implant coil was found already detached and found damaged within the introducer sheath.Testing/analysis: the concerto implant coil could not be used for resistance testing due to the damaged condition.Conclusion: based on the device analysis and reported information, the customer¿s report of ¿coil resistance/stuck in catheter¿ was confirmed as the damages found is consistent with resistance.Possible causes for coil resistance in catheters include, but not limited to, lack of hydration before procedure, insufficient continuous flush, damaged micro catheter, or tortuous anatomy.Customer reported devices were prepared per ifu, and vessel tortuosity as moderate.Therefore, the root cause could not be determined.The customer report of ¿coil kink/damage¿ and ¿pusher kink/damage¿ were confirmed.Customer reported finding the damages after removal from the micro catheter.It is possible the implant coil and pusher became damaged due to advancing against the reported resistance.The customer report of ¿non-detach¿ could not be confirmed as the device was returned detached.The tack welds were found broken, the release wire was found retracted for the pusher, and the coin was out of the lumen stop, detaching the implant as expected by the detachment subassemblies.It is possible the kinks found on the pusher caused the release wire to become temporarily stuck, contributing towards the reported non-detachment.As the merit maestro micro catheter used in the event was not returned for analysis, any contribution of the micro catheter towards the failures could not be determined.As the model and lot numbers were not reported, compatibility could not be assessed.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONCERTO NYLON
Common Device Name
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX  22210
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX   22210
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
7635265677
MDR Report Key24183273
Report Number9617601-2026-00611
Device Sequence Number21258385
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00847536044906
UDI-Public(01)00847536044906(17)280616(10)231600525
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryHK
PMA/510(K) Number
K090046
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/26/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberNV-3-8-HELIX
Device Catalogue NumberNV-3-8-HELIX
Device Lot Number231600525
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/23/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/27/2026
03/06/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/26/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/19/2026
03/26/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/16/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
SEE H11...
Patient SexFemale
-
-