• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV COREVALVE TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV COREVALVE TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number MCS-P3-29-AOA-US
Medical Device Problem Codes Perivalvular Leak (1457); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001); Intravalvular regurgitation (4068)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440); Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446); Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
Date of Event 01/22/2026
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that 11 years following the implant of a transcatheter aortic valve, central regurgitation of unknown severity was identified.Subsequently, the patient was hospitalized and experienced symptoms of heart failure.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information was received which indicated that both central regurgitation and paravalvular leak were present.Additionally, it was noted that a "pouch" was visible on fluoroscopy.A thrombus was confirmed in the "pouch" area.A non-medtronic valve was implanted valve-in-valve (viv) as treatment of the failed valve.The thrombus was no longer present after the viv.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Updated data: b5.H6.Additional codes.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that 11 years following the implant of a transcatheter aortic valve, central regurgitation of unknown severity was identified.Subsequently, the patient was hospitalized and experienced symptoms of heart failure.Additional information was received which indicated that both central regurgitation and paravalvular leak were present.Additionally, it was noted that a "pouch" was visible on fluoroscopy.A thrombus was confirmed in the "pouch" area.A non-medtronic valve was implanted valve-in-valve (viv) as treatment of the failed valve.The thrombus was no longer present after the viv.Additional information was received that the severity of the both the central regurgitation and pvl combined was moderate.The "pouch" appeared to be due to the frame of the transcatheter valve rubbing against the aorta, and the thrombus was located in the pouched area.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Updated data: b5.Corrected data: h6.Additional codes.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COREVALVE TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE
Common Device Name
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX  22210
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX   22210
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key24189249
Report Number9617601-2026-00636
Device Sequence Number13224377
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00643169448544
UDI-Public(01)00643169448544(17)161116
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P130021
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2015
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/23/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/16/2016
Device Model NumberMCS-P3-29-AOA-US
Device Catalogue NumberMCS-P3-29-AOA-US
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/22/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/27/2026
03/14/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/27/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/23/2026
03/23/2026
Date Device Manufactured11/27/2014
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization;
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight80 KG
-
-