| Catalog Number |
230792003 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/13/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.D4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an arthroplasty surgical procedure, the delta xtend locking screwdriver tine snapped when inserting locking screw into metaglene.Was surgery delayed due to the reported event? no, action taken when event occurred? replace with spare screwdriver, was procedure successfully completed? yes, were fragments generated? yes, if yes, were they removed easily without additional intervention? yes, patient status/ outcome / consequences no, was other medical intervention (e.G.X-rays, additional procedures, prescriptions, otc, revision) required: unknown, is the patient part of a clinical study unknown,.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees hat the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H11 additional narrative: added: d4 (lot), d9, h4.Corrected: d4 (primary udi).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: according to the information received, it was reported that ¿it was reported that their screw drivers were broken and they need replacements as soon as possible.¿ the product returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis revealed that locking screwdriver body has one of the distal locking tabs broken off; fragment was not returned for evaluation.Additionally, the returned device exhibits an overall worn appearance consistent with normal and constant usage; no other defects that could have contributed to the reported event were observed.The fracture issue of the locking tabs has been addressed through depuy synthes quality system with a design change in 2020.The first batches (5357743 and 5357744) of drivers per the new design were manufactured on february 7, 2020.The current complaint sample device was manufactured prior to the implementation of the new design.A dimensional inspection and functional testing were not performed as it is not applicable to the complaint condition.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the locking screwdriver body would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the information currently available, a product issue was identified during the investigation of the sample received.This product issue was addressed through depuy synthes quality system.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.Corrected: h3, h4.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|