| Catalog Number |
CQ7574 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/07/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2026, a patient underwent a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) procedure by using the conquest balloon catheter.It was reported that during the procedure, the balloon catheter allegedly ruptured.The procedure was completed using another balloon.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, photos were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2026, a patient underwent a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) procedure by using the conquest balloon catheter.It was reported that during the procedure, the balloon catheter allegedly ruptured.The procedure was completed using another balloon.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one photo was provided and reviewed.The photo shows the conquest balloon with blood residues were seen throughout the balloon.No other anomalies were noted.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.The stents present within the treatment site could have caused the balloon rupture.However, a definitive root cause for the reported balloon rupture could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.Section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant or reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|