• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR FOGARTY THRU-LUMEN EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR FOGARTY THRU-LUMEN EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number 12TLW805F35
Medical Device Problem Codes Burst Container or Vessel (1074); Material Fragmentation (1261)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/12/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Patient demographics unable to be obtained.One fogarty embolectomy catheter was received by our product evaluation laboratory for a full examination.The report of catheter burst was confirmed.As received, the balloon was found to be ruptured at central area and balloon edges did not appear to match at the ruptured region.Both windings were intact.No other visible damage was observed from the catheter body and windings.Through lumen was patent without any leakage or occlusion.The manufacturing records were reviewed for the lot involved and there is no indication of a related nonconformance.All process parameters were met and inspections passed successfully.Based on the available information there is no evidence that supports or confirms the failure mode being evaluated to be associated to a manufacturing/design defect.As part of the manufacturing process the units go through balloon and winding inspection process.The ifu was reviewed and it indicates "balloon rupture and catheter separation as a result of excessive pull force applied to remove adherent material are the most frequent causes of reported failures." and "to minimize the risk of vessel damage, balloon rupture, or tip detachment, do not exceed the maximum recommended inflation and pull force for each size catheter".Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, right after insertion, the balloon of this embolectomy fogarty catheter burst.There was no allegation of patient injury.The device was available for evaluation.As per evaluation results, the balloon was found to be ruptured at central area.Balloon edges did not appear to match at the ruptured region.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FOGARTY THRU-LUMEN EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER
Common Device Name
CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
samantha eveleigh
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492503939
MDR Report Key24208394
Report Number2015691-2026-10626
Device Sequence Number18523522
Product Code DXE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103043532
UDI-Public(01)00690103043532(17)270519(11)250217(10)66248639
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryKS
PMA/510(K) Number
K240078
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 01/29/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number12TLW805F35
Device Lot Number66248639
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/18/2025
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/05/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/29/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/17/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-