| Model Number |
CDS0801-NT |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Incomplete Coaptation (2507)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4451); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
|
| Date of Event |
01/05/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device remains implanted in patient.The device will not be returned for evaluation.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2025, a patient was presented with grade 4 degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr), st-segment elevation myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema and pleural effusion for a mitraclip procedure.A mitraclip was successfully implanted.The mr was reduced to grade 2 post procedure.On an unknown day, recurrent mr of grade 3 was observed due to flail and prolapsed leaflets.On (b)(6) 2026, a re-intervention procedure was performed.During the procedure, imaging was challenging.A single leaflet device attachment(slda) occurred from the anterior leaflet.A tear in anterior leaflet was observed.The mr was reduced to grade 2 post procedure.There was no clinically significant delay.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to the reported incomplete coaptation.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot-specific quality issue.Based on available information, a cause for the reported incomplete coaptation - single leaflet device attachment (slda) could not be conclusively determined.The cause of the reported suspected anterior leaflet tear could possibly be a cascading effect of the slda.The reported recurrent mitral valve insufficiency/ regurgitation (mr) is likely related to patient anatomy due to residual prolapse with a small flail.Mr and tissue injury are listed in the instructions for use as a known possible complication associated with the mitraclip procedures.The reported moderately challenging imaging could not be determined.The reported unexpected medical intervention was a result of case-specific circumstances as this was an additional mitraclip procedure to further reduce the mr.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
N/a.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|