|
This is 2 of 2 reports (2nd mdr).Due to the automated manufacturing execution system (mes) there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.During visual inspection, the microcatheter (subject device) was returned with a stent partially deployed from the distal tip.The microcatheter tip was seen to be damaged.The stents struts had pieced through the lumen of the microcatheter.The stent was unable to be advanced/pulled back or deployed.The stent was able to be retracted once the exposed struts were pushed back into the microcatheter.The hub of the microcatheter was cut in order to retrieve the stent.As a part of functional inspection a 0.023" pin gauge was verified to meet the catheter shaft when inserted into the catheter hub.A 0.0158" patency mandrel was advanced through the microcatheter, no friction was noted.The reported event of 'catheter shaft friction' could not be replicated; however, the analysis results are consistent with the reported event.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.Additional information provided by the customer indicated that the device was prepared for use as per the directions for use, there was no damage noted to the packaging prior to opening the packaging, the device confirmed to be in good condition during preparation/prior to use on the patient and continuous flush was set up and maintained throughout the clinical procedure.It was reported that the operator adding some force to push the stent to tip of the subject microcatheter, and when retracting the microcatheter to deploy the stent, the stent got stuck.The operator withdrew both stent and microcatheter and found tip of the stent got stuck at distal of microcatheter shaft.During analysis, the subject microcatheter was returned with a stent partially deployed from the distal tip.The catheter tip was seen to be damaged.The stents struts had pieced through the lumen of the microcatheter.The stent was unable to be advanced/pulled back or deployed.The stent was able to be retracted once the exposed struts were pushed back into the microcatheter.The hub of the microcatheter was cut in order to retrieve the stent.A 0.023" pin gauge was verified to meet the catheter shaft when inserted into the catheter hub.A 0.0158" patency mandrel was advanced through the microcatheter, no friction was noted.Based on a review of all available information and the analysis of the returned device it is probable that due to the friction experienced, the stent was advanced with force causing the struts of the stent to protrude though the subject microcatheter shaft.An assignable cause of procedural factors will be assigned to the reported event of 'catheter shaft friction' as well as the analysed event of 'catheter tip damaged' and 'catheter shaft has hole/perforation' as the issue is associated with a product that meets stryker design and manufacture specifications and was used in according with the dfu but due to procedural and/or anatomical factors during use, the product performance was limited.
|