| Catalog Number |
EIC5872-01 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/12/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during a surgery, it was noticed that the electrode of the evac 70 xtra was broken.The procedure was resumed using an equivalent sn back up device.It is unknown if there was a delay.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference case (b)(4).H11 h3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known risks with the device itself or with its use that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: h2: additional information on: e2.Corrected information on: b5.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during a surgery, it was noticed that the electrode of three (3) evac 70 xtra was broken.The procedure was resumed using an equivalent sn back up device.It is unknown if there was a delay.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection observed the returned instrument shows no manufacturing abnormalities.Product was out of the original packaging.No packaging returned.Three wands were returned in one bag.There is no way to distinguish one from another.Wand 1 - the tip is worn from use.The electrode is thin from use.The center and top electrodes are missing most of their body from use.Wand 2 - the tip is worn from use.The electrode is thin from use.The center electrode is missing most of their body from use.Wand 3 - the tip is worn from use.The electrodes are worn from use but not damaged.A functional evaluation of the device found that the opened devices were tested and plugged into the controller and registered settings (7,3).The wands produced plasma as normal and had no issues activating coag.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A definitive root cause for the reported issue could not be determined.Factors that could have contributed to the failure include procedural variance, or deviations from established protocols, increasing risks and leading to unintended consequences ((1) hitting the device tip against a hard surface.2) using the device as a lever to enlarge surgical site.3) mechanical displacement of tissue through applied force.4) activating the device above recommended settings for prolonged periods of time).Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|