|
It was reported during a therapeutic colonoscopy with polypectomy procedure, the physician decided to use the single use ligating device on a large pedunculated polyp prior to performing hot polypectomy to decrease the chances of post polypectomy bleeding.The single use ligating device was inserted into the colonoscope, and the loop was placed around the stalk (base) of the polyp.When the nurse tried to deploy the loop, it would not release.The customer then contacted olympus at the time of the event and were guided to perform troubleshooting steps.The customer ensured that the yellow stopped was fully back touching the handle and slid the slider on the handle of the subject device slowly forward to deploy (release) the loop.However, the loop still did not release.Using wire cutters, the sheath of the subject device was cut 10cm below the handle.The colonoscope was slowly removed until it was completely outside the patient and the sheath of the subject device was completely out of the scope.The colonoscope was carefully re-entered into the patient and followed the remaining device sheath to the site of the polyp.Using a single use loop cutter, the tail of the subject device was cut releasing the sheath while the loop remained on the polyp.With the loop still firmly attached to the polyp, hot polypectomy was performed to remove the single use ligating device.When this was done, the loop fell off the base of the remaining polyp.Two non-olympus endoscopic clips were used to prevent further bleeding at the polyp site.The patient was reported to be fine.The incident added an additional 30 minutes of sedation to this procedure.There were no further reports of patient harm.
|
|
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide the results of the final investigation.Updated fields: d4, d9, h2, h3, h4, h6, h7, h9, h11.The device was returned to olympus for inspection, and the reported failure was not confirmed.The device evaluation found the loop was attached to the distal end of the insertion portion, the loop was cut at the tip, the insertion portion was cut off on the handle side, and the operating pip of the control unit was not damaged.X-ray inspection showed the hook was located 50-60mm from the coil tip and the coil sheath appeared slightly bent near the coil's position.However, the hook showed no signs of displacement within the coil, and the coil itself exhibited no dilation.Pulling the loop allowed it to remove from the tip of the sheath.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Based on the results of the investigation, and since the device malfunction was not confirmed during evaluation, the definitive root cause of the reported issue could not be determined.The most probable cause of the event may be due to the following: depending on the angle or scope shape, the hook may have caught on the curved part of the coil, preventing the loop and hook from being pushed out.Should additional relevant information become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
|