|
Information received from healthcare provider via manufacturer representative regarding a patient with clinical id (b)(6), study id (b)(6) and incident type ae, subevent number: 0.Primary diagnosis: stenosis.Description: increased back pain.Onset date: 2025-04-01.Outcome status: not recovered/ not resolved.Interventions: action.Subtype: ae result in hospitalization, action result: no action.Subtype: anu.Other action(s) taken, action result: no action.Subtype: did the ae result in any treatment, action result: no.Site seriousness assessment: there is no congenital anomaly, death, disability, hospitalization, life threatening and medical intervention.Sponsor assessment: causal related to procedure and not related to any device.Diagnostics: action type: diagnostic action subtype: mri without contrast1 action type: diagnostic action subtype: were any diagnostic test performed.Action result: yes.Event: it was reported that the patient returns to office "with recurrent back and right leg pain of uncertain etiology and plan is to get lumbar mri.Additional information was received that patient outcome: recovering/resolving site serious assessment: severity of adverse event is moderate.Site related assessment: it is unlikely related to capstone peek spinal system, posterior supplemental fixation system, tlif grafting and possible related to study procedure.Investigator¿s relationship assessments: study procedure: possible (l3-4 tlif) tlif grafting material: unlikely intervertebral body fusion device: unlikely posterior supplemental fixation system: unlikely additional information was received that action type: diagnostic action.Subtype: were any diagnostic test performed.Action result: no.Additional information was received that description: spondylolisthesis of l4-l5.It was reported that the patient returns to office "with recurrent back and right leg pain of uncertain etiology and plan is to get lumbar mri.Patient gets periodic epidural injections for this leg pain is worse with standing and walking and better if she lies down chronic back pain radiating into lower right leg.Additional information was received that interventions: action subtype: ae result in hospitalization, action result: no.Action subtype: anu.Other action(s) taken, action result: no action subtype: did the ae result in any treatment, action result: yes action subtype: drug therapy, action result: yes adverse event info: does the adverse event involve a lumbosacral spinal level: yes if yes, levels involved: l4-l5 additional information was received that sponsor assessment (oc muo): sponsor and cec assessed as causal related to procedure and not related to any device.Additional information was received that site related assessment: it is unlikely related to capstone peek spinal system, posterior supplemental fixation system, tlif grafting and possible related to study procedure.Additional information was received that interventions: action subtype: surgical treatment action result: yes.Adverse event info: does the adverse event involve a lumbosacral spinal level: yes.If yes, levels involved: l2-l3, l4-l5.Add surgical proc date - 01: (b)(6) 2025.Details surg proc - 01: l2-3 posterior lumbar decompression, with neurolysis l4 nerve root and discectomy; olif l5 fracture with l4-l5 instrumentation and fusion is the additional surgical procedure an elective removal - 01: no does the additional surgical procedure involve a spinal level - 01: yes add.Surg: if yes, levels involved - 01: l2-l3, l4-l5 does the additional surgical procedure involve an explant related to the study procedure - 01: no site related assessment: additional surgery is unlikely related to capstone peekspinal system, posterior supplemental fixation system, tlif grafting and study procedure.Additional information was received that diagnostic: action type: diagnostic action subtype: ct without contrast1 action result: l3-4 there may be significant residual stenosis due laregly to anterolishesis in right lateral listhesis, subchondral superior l5 endplate fracture with a gas-filled cleft with, 30% vertebral body lo action date: (b)(6) 2025.Action type: diagnostic action subtype: were any diagnostic test performed action result: yes, it was reported that the patient returns to office "with recurrent back and right leg pain of uncertain etiology and plan is to get lumbar mri.Patient gets periodic epidural injections for this leg pain is worse with standing and walking and better if she lies down chronic back pain radiating into lower right leg.Ct scan has been done on (b)(6) 2025 and surgeon scheduled surgery for (b)(6) 2025.Additional information was received that action type: diagnostic action subtype: ct without contrast1 action result: there may be significant residual stenosis due largely to anterolisthesis in right lateral listhesis of l3 action date: (b)(6) 2025.Action type: diagnostic action subtype: ct without contrast2 action result: periprosthetic bilateral l4 pedicle fractures.Action date: (b)(6) 2025.Action type: diagnostic action subtype: ct without contrast3 action result: subchondral superior l5 endplate fracture with a gas-filled cleft with minimal nonspecific paraspinal fat stranding action date: (b)(6) 2025.Action type: diagnostic action subtype: were any diagnostic test performed action result: yes additional information was received that sponsor assessment (oc muo): sponsor assessed as causal related to procedure, possible related to posterior supplemental fixation system, not related to grafting material, ib fusion device and cec assessed as causal related to procedure and not related to any device.Additional information was received that site seriousness assessment: there is medical intervention and severity of adverse event is severe.Additional information was received that sponsor assessment (oc muo): sponsor assessed and cec assessed as causal related to tlif procedure, posterior supplemental fixation system, and possible related to grafting material, ib fusion device.Additional information was received that site related assessment: additional surgery is possible related to capstone peek spinal system, posterior supplemental fixation system, study procedure and unlikely related to tlif grafting material.Additional surgery details: l2-3, l3-4 revision pld and l2-4 decompression, l3-5 posterior fusion site related assessment: it is possible related to capstone peek spinal system, posterior supplemental fixation system, study procedure (tlif) and not related to tlif grafting material.Additional information was received that sponsor assessment (oc muo): sponsor and cec assessed as causal related to tlif procedure, posterior supplemental fixation system, tlif grafting material, ib fusion device.
|