| Model Number |
G43792 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Off-Label Use (1494); Structural Problem (2506)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/08/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
G4 - pma/510(k) #: p050017/s002 and s003.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The back of the sheath unexpectedly popped out of the handle prior to deployment.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Supplemental report is being submitted due to the completion of the investigation on 11-mar-26.Response to the below questions was received on 05-feb-2026: details of access sheath used (name, fr size, length)? - 6 fr shuttle cork.What was the target location for the stent? - right transverse sinus.What was the access site chosen? - rt femoral artery.Details of the wire guide used (name, diameter, hydrophilic)? - aristole 0.014.Was a stent previously placed during previous procedures? - no.Was the approach ipsilateral or contralateral? - no.What intervention (if any) was required? - none.Was the secondary intervention performed during the same procedure as the device failure or was it scheduled for another day? - yes , same day.Were any other defects (other than the complaint issue) observed on the delivery system prior to return (e.G., kink)? - no.Was the stent being placed through the side wall of a previously placed stent? - no.Did any part of the product snag/get caught on the stent when removing the delivery system? - no.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
G4 - pma/510(k) #: p050017/s002 and s003.Device evaluation 1 unit of lot of ziv5-18-125-10-60 was returned opened in its original packaging.The device related to this occurrence underwent a laboratory evaluation on 09 february 2026.Observations from the lab evaluation were as follows; red safety tab not returned.Device returned with outer sheath separated from handle directly below white connector cap.Outer sheath examined and no other issues observed.White distal tip examined and no issues observed.Device flushes without any issue.0.018 inch wire guide passes through device without any issue.Unable to deploy stent due to outer sheath separation noted previously.The reported failure was observed.Manufacturing records prior to distribution all devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.Instructions for use and/label there is evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use.Abnormal use complaints are considered to be beyond any further reasonable means of interface-related risk control by the manufacturer.It is unknown how the device will function outside of its intended use.Trending will monitor if any future investigation is required.As per the instructions for use, ifu0043 which informs the user about indications for use "the zilver vascular stent is intended for use as an adjunct to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) in the treatment of symptomatic vascular disease of the iliac arteries up to 100mm in length with a reference vessel diameter of 5 to 9mm.Patients should be suitable candidates for pta and/or stent treatment¿.As per medical advisor using the device in the right transverse sinus is considered abnormal use engineering was contacted to check if the abnormal use of using this device in the right transverse sinus would have caused the complaint issue and they confirmed that it is likely that the abnormal use caused the device failure as per answer to one of the additional questions a 0.014 inch wire guide was used.There is evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use in relation to the wire guide (ifu0043).As per section 6.6.3 of (b)(4) this event will be documented in the pms log.Image review an image was not returned for evaluation.Root cause analysis a definitive root cause could be attributed to abnormal use.As per medical advisor using the device in the right transverse sinus is considered abnormal use and engineering have confirmed that it is likely that the abnormal use caused the device failure confirmation of complaint is confirmed based on visual and/or functional inspection.Corrective action/correction complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for similar events.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|