| Catalog Number |
110-480 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
| Date of Event |
01/20/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A review of the device history record has been completed.No deviations or non-conformances noted.Further information from the reporter regarding event, product, or patient details has been requested.No additional information is available at this time.Reason for reoperation: rupture.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported "capsular contractures, baker grades i, possible rupture and exchange from textured to smooth breast implants due to the patient¿s concern with the product".This record is for the left side.Device remains implanted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported "capsular contractures, baker grades i, possible rupture and exchange from textured to smooth breast implants due to the patient¿s concern with the product".This record is for the left side.Device was explanted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional, changed, and/or corrected data: b.5., d.6b., h.6.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Healthcare professional reported "capsular contractures, baker grades i, possible rupture and exchange from textured to smooth breast implants due to the patient¿s concern with the product".This record is for the left side.Device was explanted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation:per the investigation procedure, the device is analyzed through visual inspection microscopic inspection if openings are observed and a weight verification.Per the analysis performed, the assessments of the complaints and any potential manufacturing issue are displayed along with any further actions required: - rupture: observed three openings through microscopic inspection assessed as surgical damage, observed broken device through microscopic inspection assessed as unidentified (tear) opening and observed a missing piece of shell through microscopic inspection assessed as inconclusive.No further actions are required as it is not related to the manufacturing process.- anxiety - product/ procedure: unable to observe through visual inspection as it is a physiological phenomenon.- capsular contracture: unable to observe through visual inspection as it is a physiological phenomenon.None of the other observations performed during the device analysis creases and wear abrasion are found to be potentially related to the manufacturing process, and, therefore, no further actions are required for these observations.Additional, changed, and/or corrected data: d4, d9, h3, h6.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|