|
|
| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/19/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The device has not been received by the manufacturer for evaluation.Each event reported to bd is evaluated and investigated in accordance with our complaint investigation procedures.The investigation process includes, but is not limited to, evaluation of the event details provided by the complaint facility, a review of complaint history, manufacturing records and risk document where applicable, and an evaluation of the subject device when available to identify potential contributing factors.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported frequent problems with the powerloc max port cannula.These can be locked in place with the base plate, which rests on the patient's skin.However, this locking mechanism for the retaining plate is too loose, causing the port needle to slip out of the port chamber during treatment and allowing the infusion solution to leak into the surrounding tissue.There have been no reports of adverse effects from patients or users.An exact number of occurrences has not been provided by the complainant.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.One 20g x 1.0in.Powerloc max infusion set with ref: 0142010 and lot: asjyfc001 was returned under this pr.However, the returned device did not match the device involved in the reported event.Additionally, no defects were identified in the device.Given the lack of relation of the returned device to any reported event, receipt of the device will be documented in this investigation, but the rest of the investigation will be conducted as if no sample was returned.The complaint of needle dislodgement was inconclusive because no sample was returned to bd for evaluation.The event details and provided information were evaluated.The investigation included a review of the appropriate risk documentation; no abnormalities were found as the listed element(s) either met requirements or was/were not informative of a potential root cause.This information was also assessed for the potential of this event to be within scope of an existing capa or scar, but none were positively identified and the reported event could not be confirmed to be within the scope of an existing capa or scar.Following a review of the entirety of this information, the root cause for this specific event was ultimately inconclusive.In this instance the implicated product sample would be required to confirm the event and assess the potential root cause.This complaint will be recorded for future trending and monitoring purposes.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|