|
MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR MEMORYGEL BOOST IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS, BREAST, NONINFLATABLE, INTERNAL, SILICONE GEL-FILLED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
SMHB330 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Capsular Contracture (1761); Scar Tissue (2060); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
11/25/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: grade iv capsular contracture, hypertrophic scarring, implant site fluid collections.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A female patient who underwent primary breast augmentation with mentor memorygel boost 330-cc silicone implants presented with bilateral grade iv capsular contracture, hypertrophic scarring of both breasts, and a postoperative right-sided periprosthetic fluid collection; these issues were diagnosed based on her presenting symptoms, and on (b)(6) 2026 she underwent bilateral explantation with capsulectomy and revision mastopexy, with the treating clinician advising against immediate re-implantation and recommending a waiting period of at least three months before considering replacement.This report relates to the right side.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Suspect device received on february 10, 2026.Device evaluation completed on february 15, 2026: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.During visual evaluation, no apparent damage or visual anomalies were observed on the returned device.Regarding the reported capsular contracture condition, there are not enough details to determine the factors that may have caused this condition.Capsular contracture in the patient¿s breast might be the result of the body¿s individual physiological response to the implantation of a foreign object in soft tissue.Further, capsular contracture is a known complication associated with these devices and is referenced in our current product insert data sheet.Hypertrophic scarring may result from delayed/impaired wound healing.Skin tension is frequently implicated in hypertrophic scar formation.Abnormal scar healing commonly involves areas of high skin tension.Other factors implicated in the etiology of abnormal scar formation include wound infection or anoxia, a prolonged inflammatory response, and wound orientation different from the relaxed skin tension lines.Hypertrophic scarring is a known complication associated with any surgical incision and is referenced in our current product insert data sheet.As part of mentor's quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released according to approved specifications.Based on the results of this investigation, it was determined that the product met the manufacturing release the manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was reviewed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|