| Model Number |
E321.232 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Joint Laxity (4526)
|
| Date of Event |
01/12/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Trinity revision of the ecima liner and modular head after approximately 9 years, 5 months and 2 weeks due to instability and dislocation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Per (b)(4) initial report.Additional information including: post primary and pre revision x-rays.Operative notes (primary and revision).Patient weight, activity level and medical history.Did the patient follow the correct post-op protocol? did the patient experience any slips / falls or other trauma post primary surgery? were there any fixation concerns during the primary surgery? an update on the patient post revision has been requested in order to progress with the investigation of this event, and if received, will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation the appropriate device details have been provided and the relevant device manufacturing records will be identified and reviewed.Please note: this report is filed with the fda due to an adverse event experienced with a device that is similar to those placed on the market in the usa, however, this event occured outside of the usa.The submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the device, reporting entity, entity's representative or distributor caused or contributed to the event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Trinity revision of the ecima liner and modular head after approximately 9 years, 5 months and 2 weeks due to instability and dislocation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Per (b)(4) final report.Additional information including: post primary and pre revision x-rays.Operative notes (primary and revision).Patient weight, activity level and medical history.Did the patient follow the correct post-op protocol? did the patient experience any slips / falls or other trauma post primary surgery? were there any fixation concerns during the primary surgery? an update on the patient post revision.Has been requested in order to progress with the investigation of this event, however, none of this information was provided and thus the scope of the investigation was limited.The appropriate device details were provided and the relevant device manufacturing records have been identified and reviewed.All parts associated with these records conformed to material and dimensional specification at the time of manufacture.Based on the available information, no further investigation can be conducted and the root cause of the reported dislocation/ instability could not be determined.Therefore, this case is now considered closed, however should any additional information be provided then this case may be re-opened.Please note: this report is filed with the fda due to an adverse event experienced with a device that is similar to those placed on the market in the usa, however, this event occured outside of the usa.The submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the device, reporting entity, entity's representative or distributor caused or contributed to the event.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|