|
A bipap auto biflex device was returned to a third party service center as part of the sound abatement foam recall process with no initial alleged complaint during the evaluation of the device, the service technician observed visible foam particles inside the blower kit and object code indicates the blower contributed to the foam degradation.Additionally, the service technician noted dust fail contamination.The evaluation of the device data identified unrelated error codes.These error codes are consistent with normal device operation and expected use conditions and are not considered reportable under medical device reporting requirements.No evidence was identified to suggest that these error codes contributed to our caused the reported event.The device was scrapped by the service center after the evaluation was completed.
|