|
Block h6 device code a1702 is being used to capture the reportable event of anchor exchange failure to retrieve.Device evaluation block h11 the overstitch ess was returned for analysis, and media was submitted with the complaint.The device was returned with the anchor exchange.During the visual inspection, it was not possible identify any damages.The documentation attached included some pictures and videos where it can be observed the physician using the overstitch.However, it is not possible identify any issue.During the microscope inspection, the anchor exchange worked successfully to deploy, retrieve, and pass anchor.Additionally, the needle body was not found bent.The device was observed in good conditions and the device worked as expected during the microscope inspection.During the functional test, the anchor exchange worked successfully to deploy, retrieve, and pass anchor.The reported events of anchor exchange failure to pass anchor, anchor exchange failure to retrieve anchor and needle shaft failure to align could not be confirmed.A risk review of the overstitch ess was completed and confirmed that the events of anchor exchange failure to pass anchor, anchor exchange failure to retrieve anchor and needle shaft failure to align were defined in the risk documentation.These event types have been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.It was confirmed this device met manufacturing specification prior to distribution and there were no manufacturing deviations which could have contributed to the reported event.There is no evidence the device was improperly used per the instructions for use (ifu), and there is no evidence that there is any issue with translation, wording, or graphics of the ifu/labeling information.Based on all gathered information, the probable cause selected is "device problem excluded", because the device was observed in good conditions and worked as expected during the microscope and functional inspections.The analysis of the available information and product analysis of the returned device did not identify any evidence of either the alleged issues.For the reported events, it happened during the procedure and there is not an objective evidence or descriptive conditions to confirm it.
|