|
W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS WITH HEPARIN BIOACTIVE SURFACE; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
VBJR081502A |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Activation Failure (3270); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/20/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The following patient information was asked to the physician but was not available: initials, age, weight, date of birth, comorbidities, medications.A1: no patient specific details have been provided.Therefore, the patient identifier (in confidence) reflect the gore internal case number.Cbas® heparin surface incorporates carmeda heparin manufactured from heparin sodium api, which is covalently bound to the device surface and is essentially non-eluting.W.L.Gore & associates, inc.(gore) is submitting this report to comply with 21 c.F.R.Part 803, the medical device reporting regulation.This report is based upon information obtained by gore, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Blank fields present on this report include required fields and fields determined to be not applicable.Blank required fields indicate that the information was not provided, was deemed unavailable or was not applicable.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, gore, or its associates that the device, gore or its associates caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute a legal admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any defects or has malfunctioned, as defined from a legal standpoint.These words are included in the report and are fixed items for selection created by the fda, to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of reporting pursuant to part 803.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2026, a male patient underwent an endovascular stenting procedure to treat aneurysm and occlusion of the popliteal artery during which a gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis with heparin bioactive surface (viabahn device) was used.During the procedure, the device experienced difficulty during deployment.The deployment line was difficult to pull, and bowstringing was observed.Deployment was stopped.No distal expansion was initiated, and the device was withdrawn back through the sheath.The reporter stated that the guidewire (unknown brand) did not provide sufficient support (not stiff enough), and the up-and-over approach from groin access created a long device path, which could have contributed to the deployment failure.The procedure was completed using another viabahn device.No additional procedural or clinical details were provided, and no patient harm was reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Updated: h6 adverse event problem codes to account for investigation and findings.A review of manufacturing records verified that the lot involved in this complaint met all pre-release specifications.Product return evaluation: the device as returned was consistent with attempted deployment and no endo expansion.The deployment knob was detached from the hub with loose deployment line at the knob and transition.The engineers were able to continue deployment via the knob, though replication of the reported failure modes is not always possible because of differences between conditions seen in vivo (i.E., patient anatomy, procedural conditions) and those seen in the laboratory.The root cause of the excessive deployment force was determined to be procedure related.It was reported that ¿¿the guidewire (unknown brand) did not provide sufficient support (not stiff enough), and the up and over approach from groin access created a long device path, which could have contributed to the deployment failure.¿ no information was available to evaluate the stiffness of the guidewire used.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|