|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 2/9/2026 h6 component code: g07002 - no device problem found this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.Additional information was requested, the following: did the needle or the suture thread break? suture thread all pieces were retrieved and x-ray taken multiple times during procedure ¿ in case the needle broke¿ ¿ did the needle fall into the patient? ¿ if so, ¿ ¿ was the needle piece(s) retrieved during the same procedure? ¿ ¿ were x-rays taken to locate the needle piece(s)? ¿ ¿ what measures were implemented to retrieve the broken piece? ¿ ¿ was there any additional tissue damage resulting from the search for the needle piece? ¿ - does a fragment of the needle remain in the patient¿s tissue? ¿ if so, ¿ ¿ is there any plan in place to remove the needle piece in the future? ¿ ¿ if so, could you please provide the scheduled date for the removal? ¿ ¿ in which tissue structure was the broken needle located? ¿ ¿ what is the surgeon¿s opinion of the potential consequences for the patient? - please provide the source or name of person providing answers to follow-up questions: h3 investigational summary: the product was returned to eth for evaluation.Visual inspection revealed that one labeled winding former, one used needle and one needle suture piece inside one open overwrap packet were received for analysis.The product code 9702h is double armed.During visual inspection of the detached needle, significant marks were observed on the needle hole and swage area, likely caused by a surgical instrument.The barrel hole was crushed therefore no suture remnat could be observed.The needle suture piece was examined, and the end of the suture was noted to be cut probably caused by a surgical instrument.No evidence of suture breakage was identified during the evaluation.The other section of suture was not returned for evaluation.Per the conditions of the returned sample, the functional test could not be performed.As part of the eth quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.No conclusion could be reached as to what caused the reported complaint.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number, and no non-conformances were identified.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|