| Catalog Number |
ASC4250-01 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Separation (1562)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/18/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).H2: h3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known risks with the device itself or with its use that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a shoulder procedure, the black plastic tube at the front end of the shaft of one (1) super turbovac 90 fell off.The procedure was resumed, after a non-significant delay, using an equivalent s+n back-up.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11 h3, h6 the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection observed the returned instrument shows no manufacturing abnormalities.Product was out of the original packaging.No packaging returned.The tip is worn from use.The shaft covering is damaged near the tip of the device, a section has been ripped or torn off from its body.There are tool markings around where the covering is missing.The metal shaft below the covering is exposed.A functional evaluation was performed on the returned device and found the device was plugged into the controller and registered settings (1,7).The wand had no issues producing plasma or activating coag.The resistance measured at 0.91 kilo ohms.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A definitive root cause for the reported issue could not be determined.Factors that could have contributed to the failure include procedural variance, or deviations from established protocols, increasing risks and leading to unintended consequences.Other factor lines include hitting the device tip against a hard surface such as an insertion cannula, using the device as a lever to enlarge surgical site, mechanical displacement of tissue through applied force or activating the device above recommended settings for prolonged periods of time.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|