|
A bipap device was returned to a third-party service center with no initial alleged complaint.There was no report of serious or permanent harm or injury.There was no report of medical intervention.During evaluation no foam particles were noted in the airpath, yet foam degradation was noted.The device's sound abatement foam was replaced to address the issue.Additionally, the service technician also noted dust contamination, and the evaluation of the device data identified unrelated error codes.These error codes are consistent with normal device operation and expected use conditions and are not considered reportable under medical device reporting requirements.No evident was identified to suggest that these error codes contributed to or caused the reported event.
|