| Model Number |
SR-1030-CS |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Positioning Problem (3009); Activation Failure (3270)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Stroke/CVA (1770)
|
| Date of Event |
12/09/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient experienced a stroke, requiring additional intervention.An enroute transcarotid stent was selected for use in a left sided transcarotid artery revascularization (tcar) procedure.After the stent was placed, the physician was instructed to take an orthogonal view, but did not feel it was necessary.The stent appeared completely open.The patient went to the post anesthesia care unit (pacu) and was doing well the next morning.Post tcar procedure, the patient experienced a stroke.Subsequent imaging revealed calcification at the base of the stent, which impinged on the stent and prevented it from opening completely.Additionally, it was noted that the stent was positioned too high.The patient was transferred to another medical center, and the artery was revascularized with another stent.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
We are unable to provide the complete unique identifier (udi) # for this product.All available product data has been included in this report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient experienced a stroke, requiring additional intervention.An enroute transcarotid stent was selected for use in a left sided transcarotid artery revascularization (tcar) procedure.After the stent was placed, the physician was instructed to take an orthogonal view, but did not feel it was necessary.The stent appeared completely open.The patient went to the post anesthesia care unit (pacu) and was doing well the next morning.Post tcar procedure, the patient experienced a stroke.Subsequent imaging revealed calcification at the base of the stent, which impinged on the stent and prevented it from opening completely.Additionally, it was noted that the stent was positioned too high.The patient was transferred to another medical center, and the artery was revascularized with another stent.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
We are unable to provide the complete unique identifier (udi) # for this product.All available product data has been included in this report.Updated fields: h6 - evaluation method codes; evaluation conclusion codes.Review of the instructions for use (ifu) confirmed that the content was sufficient and did not contribute to the reported event; therefore, no updates are required to the document at this time.A review of the enroute transcarotid stent device confirmed that the reported event is a known event defined in the product's risk management documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of known inherent risk of device.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|