| Model Number |
251 (+ 18 D) |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Sharp Edges (4013)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Capsular Bag Tear (2639)
|
| Date of Event |
01/15/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This initial emdr is being submitted to the fda for a reportable event that occurred outside the usa.Posterior capsule rupture is indicated as a potential adverse event related to iol implantation, as stated under the warnings section of the product's instructions for use (ifu).Regarding section h6 - manufacturer's codes for: type of investigation, findings, and conclusion are pending completion of product investigation.Once the product investigation is completed, a follow-up report will be submitted to fda which will include the manufacturer's codes for type of investigation, findings, and conclusion.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Event occurred in china.Leading haptic reported.Capsular bag tear rupture.The patient underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation under topical anesthesia on (b)(6) 2026.During the implantation, the leading haptic of the intraocular lens tore the posterior capsule while unfolding.After adjusting the position of the intraocular lens and instilling carbachol to constrict the pupil, the iol was centered in the capsular bag.The surgery was completed smoothly with no adverse effects.Please refer to the attachment surgical picture.Problem code: a051102 - sharp edges.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report # 1 emdr is being submitted to fda for a reportable event that occurred outside the usa.The report includes corrected and additional information not available/included in the initial report.Corrected information: h6 - updated codes for manufacturer's investigation: type; findings; and conclusion.Additional information: g6 - type of report - noted as follow-up #1.H2 - type of follow-up - noted for additional information.The product was not returned to the manufacturer.The investigation was conducted, with the methods and results as noted below.No abnormalities were found in production and inspection records of the product (serial no.: (b)(6); model: 251).The exact root cause was not determined.However, based on the available information and our investigation, we believe this event was not caused by our product quality.A review of the most recent complaint trending data indicates that no significant trends have been identified at this time and no capa is required as part of the product evaluation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|