• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 11500A
Medical Device Problem Codes Calcified (1077); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Dyspnea (1816); Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 01/05/2026
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: attempts have been made to obtain product for evaluation.No device was returned.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry and investigation that a 23mm 11500a aortic valve was explanted after an implant duration of four (4) years, and 10 months due to unknown reason.The explanted valve was replaced with a 23mm 11500a aortic valve.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional "customer complaint." the information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: updated sections b5, b7, g3, g6, h2, h6 (component code, health effect - clinical code, device code(s)).Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry and investigation that a 23mm 11500a aortic valve was explanted after an implant duration of four (4) years, and 10 months due to severe stenosis.The explanted valve was replaced with a 23mm 11500a aortic valve.Per medical record, the patient presented heart failure and dyspnea.The patient underwent redo-avr with 23mm inspiris valve, concomitantly had an mvr with a non-edwards device, and excision of right atrial mass.Post bypass echo showed prosthesis were well seated with no evidence of paravalvular leak.The patient was transferred to icu in stable condition.Pathology report showed explanted aortic valve with degeneration and calcification.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Svd is a logical and expected consequence of the chemical, mechanical, and immunological processes associated with bhv implantation.The common endpoint of all these factors is calcification and degradation.Svd is an acquired condition, intrinsic to bioprosthetic valves, characterized by deterioration of the leaflets or supporting structures, leading to thickening, calcification, tearing, or disruption of the prosthetic valve materials.These changes result in valvular dysfunction manifesting as stenosis and/or regurgitation with a consequent drop in hemodynamic efficacy of the valve.Prior investigations and extensive literature review have shown that svd is predominantly related to patient factors and implant duration rather than to manufacturing issues.Events related to device design, manufacturing, or use error tend to manifest at an earlier implant duration.There is no evidence to suggest a manufacturing defect caused or contributed to the reported event.Per the instructions for use (ifu), structural valve deterioration (svd) is a known potential risk associated with bioprosthetic heart valves.Based on the information available, the root cause remains indeterminable as no patient or procedural factors known to cause or contribute to svd were reported.A device history record (dhr) review [was performed, and no relevant non-conformances were identified.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE
Common Device Name
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
jason reeves
1 edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492503859
MDR Report Key24340187
Report Number2015691-2026-11120
Device Sequence Number18580529
Product Code LWR
UDI-Device Identifier00690103194982
UDI-Public(01)00690103194982(17)241014(11)201015
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P150048
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2026
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/27/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/14/2024
Device Model Number11500A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/21/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/06/2026
03/17/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/13/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/03/2026
03/30/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured10/15/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Life Threatening; Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-