|
The customer reported that during their performance qualification validation for their new ih-1000 sn (b)(6)., false negative test results were observed.During validation, 6 samples tested positive with their old ih-1000s (production instruments) but tested negative on the ih-1000 sn 6300008.The results on the new ih-1000 sn (b)(6) were auto-verified.The samples were tested on (b)(6) 2026 (please see also report 9610824-2026-00006).And (b)(6) 2026 (this report).The customer stated qc passed prior to running the validation samples.She also reported the reactions were 3+ on the old ih-1000s.According to her, the samples were tested within 24 hours of being tested on the old ih-1000s vs.The new ih-1000.The investigation of this case is still ongoing.
|
|
The customer reported that during their performance qualification validation for their new ih-1000 sn (b)(6)., false negative test results were observed.During validation, 6 samples tested positive with their old ih-1000s (production instruments) but tested negative on the ih-1000 sn (b)(6).The results on the new ih-1000 sn (b)(6) were auto-verified.The samples were tested on (b)(6) 2026 (please see also report 9610824-2026-00006).And (b)(6) 2026 (this report).The customer stated qc passed prior to running the validation samples.She also reported the reactions were 3+ on the old ih-1000s.According to her, the samples were tested within 24 hours of being tested on the old ih-1000s vs.The new ih-1000.Investigation: no other complaints have been recorded for the materials used by the customer: ih-cell pool, lot 9550011, exp.09.02.2026, and ih-card ahg anti-igg, lot 9530010, exp.21.11.2026.Based on the records, we can confirm that no product related quality issue is directly involved in the reported case.Based on the trace files analysis for ih-1000 sn (b)(6) and ih-1000 sn (b)(6), using our ih-1000 analysis tools on the reported samples (sample (b)(6) and sample (b)(6)), we confirm that no instrument-related issue directly contributed to the reported discrepancy.All processing steps, including dispensing, pipetting, and incubation, were performed within instrument specifications.See below this email for reference.Based on the image analysis of the gel card images used for the days of the reported issue, we noted that the gel cards were used in poor condition: the gel-to-supernatant ratio was very low for cards manufactured on 21.07.2025, even though more than 11 months remained before expiration date.Several cards showed clear signs of dried out gel, as circled in the images below this email for reference.Visible cracks in the gel matrix confirm gel dryness.These cards should not be used for testing and raise a key concerns about storage conditions at the customer site.Resolution: based on the condition of the cards, we assume that the customer may not be using the gel control options, which would have helped detect and reject unsuitable cards before testing.Given all these findings, the discrepancy between the 2 samples is considered pre-analytical, caused by the use of improperly dried gel cards, rather than an instrument or product-related issue.To help prevent similar issues, we recommend advising the customer to carefully monitor storage conditions and avoid using any gel cards showing dryness or physical deterioration.
|