| Catalog Number |
6565-0-232 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Fall (1848)
|
| Date of Event |
01/20/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Review of the device history records indicate that devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.There have been no other events for the lot referenced.If additional information is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The following information was provided: the mps reported that: "i am reporting a medical device vigilance case following a mako pth on the left side performed on (b)(6) 2023.After falling out of bed, the patient returned a few days ago and the scan showed that the alumina ceramic head had exploded." "the revision is scheduled for today.We will keep the head and the pieces to send them back to the manufacturer and get feedback on the material analysis.".
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No new information.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Reported event:
an event regarding crack/fracture involving a ceramic head was reported.The event was confirmed via evaluation of the photographs provided.Method & results:
-product evaluation and results: the reported device was not returned however photographs were provided for review.The photographs show a recently explanted ceramic head fractured into pieces.No other inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.-clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated:
conclusion of assessment
reported event of failure is confirmed.The time course would indicate that the fall is a causal factor of implant failure.It is not confirmed that the implant contributed to the fall or that there were proceeding signs of implant failure.Possible procedure related factors that may have contributed to the event include ceramic-on-ceramic articulation.Identified patient risk factors for increased implant failure risk in this patient include male sex.There is no confirmed device related factors identified that contributed to adverse event.-product history review: review of the device history records indicate the devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions:
the reported device was not returned however photographs were provided for review.The photographs show a recently explanted ceramic head fractured into pieces.A review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated:
conclusion of assessment
reported event of failure is confirmed.The time course would indicate that the fall is a causal factor of implant failure.It is not confirmed that the implant contributed to the fall or that there were proceeding signs of implant failure.Possible procedure related factors that may have contributed to the event include ceramic-on-ceramic articulation.Identified patient risk factors for increased implant failure risk in this patient include male sex.There is no confirmed device related factors identified that contributed to adverse event.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|