|
The agent reported, "patient fell and sustained a hip fracture.M/76." the previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 1 month, 10 days apart.This evaluation is limited in scope as the item(s) associated with this investigation was not returned to djo surgical - austin for examination.The surgery was completed as intended and without incident.If additional information regarding the reported event is submitted at a future date, this investigation will be re-evaluated.There was no other information submitted with this complaint about any patient activities, accidents, or medical contraindications that may have contributed to the reported event.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate that the reported device(s) was defective.The surgeon performed this procedure to remedy the patient's condition.No further action is deemed necessary.A review of the device history record(s) show that the reported component(s) used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no nonconforming material reports associated with the product(s) that may have contributed to the reported event.The device(s) was verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and was within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.There was an ncmr# (b)(4) associated with the concomitant part # 402-03-402, head, femoral, ceramys, 40mm, m, 0mm, documenting that, out of a 62-part lot, 6 parts were returned to the external manufacturer for rework due to shrink-wrap damage.The nonconforming material was detected at incoming inspection.Customer complaint history of the reported device(s) showed no present trends or ongoing issues that need review.Inventory containment is not required as there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.The revision surgery was completed successfully.The root cause of this complaint was revision surgery due to a hip fracture after a fall.No other information regarding the patient's pre-existing conditions or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event was submitted to the complaint.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an event beyond djo surgical's control.
|