|
(b)(4) date sent: 2/18/2026 b3: exact event date unk, entered 1/1/2026 as only the year was provided.D4: batch # 747d80.Investigation summary the product was returned to ees for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample determined that the tlc75 device was received with no apparent damage and with a reload loaded in the device.The reload had the proximal 5 drivers up without staples, and the remaining drivers down with staples present.The returned reload had the swing tab in the locked position.The reload was reset and the device was tested for functionality with the returned reload and it fired, cut, and formed all the remaining staples as intended.The staple line and cut line were complete and the staples meet the staple form release criteria.The event reported of malformed staples was confirmed and it is related to improper use of the device.It should be noted that the cartridge reload is designed to lockout, as a safety feature, if any staples have been fired from the cartridge reload.In addition, failure to complete the stroke may result in incomplete staple line.Please reference the instruction for use for more information.The event described of difficult to open could not be confirmed as the device performed as intended and it opened and closed without any difficulties noted.As part of ees quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Device history review a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number 747d80 , and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: during dr.Case during the side-to-side anastomosis the surgeon fired the device without difficulty.When he pulled back the firing knob and began separating the handles, the device became stuck.At that point, he noticed that some of the staples had fallen and were not fully formed on the tissue.The team removed the reload, replaced it with a new one, and the subsequent firing functioned normally.I did confirm with the surgical tech that the device did cut, and the cut line was complete.The surgical tech and the surgeon informed the nurse coordinator, who then reached out to me regarding the issue.Fortunately, no patient harm occurred during this case.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|