• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC GRAND RAPIDS EOPA ARTERIAL CANNULA; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIO

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC GRAND RAPIDS EOPA ARTERIAL CANNULA; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIO Back to Search Results
Model Number 77418
Medical Device Problem Codes Contamination (1120); Material Deformation (2976)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/12/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the eopa arterial cannula product exhibited an appearance of three white dots and tip damage.The use of the device was unspecified.No patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional info b5: the device was used to complete the procedure additional info b5: medtronic received additional information that the tip did not detach from the cannula body.The cannula was not heated or cooled prior to use.Correction d3: manufacturer name, street, city, region, and post code all updated medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional info b5: medtronic received additional information that the tip was not damaged but the cannula body was damaged medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional info b5: medtronic received additional information that the customer cut and created a damage in order to examine the cannula clearly.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation summary: visual inspection showed the device was cut into two sections when it was received and there was evidence of a couple of white spots.The reason for the return was confirmed.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information received shows that there is no information to reasonably suggest that the device in this report may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or that the device in this report has malfunctioned.The damaged cannula body was caused by the surgeon, as the surgeon cut and created the damage so as to examine the reported 3 white dots issue reported.Therefore, this event did not and does not meet the reporting requirements in 21 cfr 803.Reports sent under medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the eopa arterial cannula product exhibited an appearance of three white dots and tip damage.The device was used to complete the procedure.See the attached photos.No patient complications have been reported as a result of this event medtronic received additional information that the tip did not detach from the cannula body.The cannula was not heated or cooled prior to use.Medtronic received additional information that the tip was not damaged but the cannula body was damaged.Medtronic received additional information that the customer cut and created a damage in order to examine the cannula clearly.Medtronic received additional information that the white spot issue is the only issue being reported and these white spots were observed when device was inserted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EOPA ARTERIAL CANNULA
Common Device Name
CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIO
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC GRAND RAPIDS
620 watson sw
grand rapids,mi MN 49504
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC GRAND RAPIDS
620 watson sw
grand rapids,mi MN 49504
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key24386320
Report Number2184009-2026-00270
Device Sequence Number10289100
Product Code DWF
UDI-Device Identifier00763000135614
UDI-Public(01)00763000135614(17)281020(10)0232538802(20)03
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountrySP
PMA/510(K) Number
K031037
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/24/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number77418
Device Catalogue Number77418
Device Lot Number0232538802
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/13/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/20/2026
02/23/2026
03/24/2026
04/16/2026
04/20/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/19/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/23/2026
02/24/2026
04/16/2026
04/17/2026
04/24/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/21/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-