|
|
| Catalog Number |
3549224 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
|
| Date of Event |
11/27/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A female patient who underwent breast reconstruction primary with mentor ce med hgt te w/sut tabs 550cc, tissue expander experienced left sided deflation post operation.The issue was diagnosed through ultrasound examination.As a result, the patient underwent unilateral replacement with sn (b)(6) on (b)(6) 2026.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: deflation.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The mentor failure analysis lab has received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation completed on june 01, 2026:
the product was returned to mentor for evaluation, where a thorough investigation was conducted.During visual evaluation, no apparent damage or visual anomalies were observed on the returned device.Leak testing was performed, according to the mentor procedure, and it revealed three tears on the anterior view, measuring approximately 0.3 cm tear (a), 0.1 cm tear (b) and 0.1 cm tear (c).Microscopic examination was performed on the edges of the ruptures, and parallel striations were found in the whole area of the tears (b) and (c).Parallel striations are consistent with markings made by a sharp object perforating the tissue expander shell.The cause of the tear (a) could not be identified.Mentor also performed a manufacturing record evaluation related to the reported complaint for the finished device lot number.No manufacturing non-conformances were identified as part of this evaluation.Based on the information currently available, microscopic examination of the tears (b) and (c) indicates that the tissue expander could have been damaged during or subsequent to implantation.The product insert data sheet cautions to not allow cautery devices or sharp instruments, such as scalpels, suture needles, hypodermic needles, hemostats, adson forceps or scissors to contact the device during the implantation or other surgical procedures.Based on the information currently available, a notification was sent to mentor's manufacturing team for further investigation.In conclusion, according to the evaluation performed and data records reviewed on the complaint, the deflation reported is not able to be confirmed as a manufacturing defect.Although no conclusion could be reached on the cause of the rupture (a), the instructions for use contain the following caution: the silicone shell of the tissue expander may easily be cut by a scalpel or ruptured by excessive stress, manipulation with blunt instruments, or penetration by a needle.Subsequent deflation and/or rupture could result.All devices should be carefully inspected for structural integrity prior to and during implantation.As part of mentor's quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released according to approved specifications.Based on the results of this investigation, it was determined that the product met the manufacturing release criteria: no corrective and preventive action (capa) is required now.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|