• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORCYM S.R.L. PERCEVAL PLUS SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE; TISSUE HEART VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORCYM S.R.L. PERCEVAL PLUS SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE; TISSUE HEART VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number PVF-S
Medical Device Problem Code Degraded (1153)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Aortic Valve Stenosis (1717)
Date of Event 01/08/2026
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturing and material records for the device involved in this event, as they pertain to the reported issue, were retrieved and reviewed by the manufacturer¿s quality engineering.The results confirmed that this prosthesis satisfied all required material, visual, and performance standards at the time of manufacture and release.Based on the limited information available, the definitive root cause of the reported event cannot be established at this time.However, from the document review performed, no manufacturing deficiencies were noted.As reported in the scientific literature, structural valve deterioration is the major cause of failure of bioprosthetic heart valves and the principal underlying pathologic process is cuspal calcification.Calcification can also cause stenosis due to cuspal stiffening.Calcific deposits are usually localized to cuspal tissue (intrinsic calcification).It is possible that the patient¿s clinical history and risk factors (i.E., hypertension) may have contributed to the structural valve deterioration observed in this perceval plus valve, but this cannot ultimately be confirmed.It should be noted that structural valve deterioration is listed as a possible adverse event in the perceval plus ifu.The event is, therefore, a known inherent risk of the device.
 
Event or Problem Description
The manufacturer was informed of this event through mantra database.Reportedly, a perceval plus valve pvf-s was implanted on (b)(6) 2023.After more than 2 years, the patient had severe aortic stenosis that required av reintervention with tavr on (b)(6) 2026 to resolve the issue.The outcome was reported as recovered/resolved.Patient's clinical history included systemic hypertension; diabetes mellitus: type ii, non-insulin dependent; dyslipidemia; hyperthyroidism; other disease: sleep apnea; aortic valve replacement: biological 2013; and was nyha class iii.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERCEVAL PLUS SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE
Common Device Name
TISSUE HEART VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORCYM S.R.L.
via per crescentino sn
saluggia, vc 13040
IT  13040
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORCYM CANADA CORP.
5005 north fraser way
burnaby, bc V5J 5 M1
CA   V5J 5M1
Manufacturer Contact
laura mannino
5005 north fraser way
burnaby, bc V5J 5-M1
CA   V5J 5M1
MDR Report Key24408202
Report Number3004478276-2026-00119
Device Sequence Number12803985
Product Code LWR
UDI-Device Identifier08022057015365
UDI-Public(01)08022057015365(240)PVF-S(17)261202
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateLA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P150011
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Study,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 02/20/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberPVF-S
Device Catalogue NumberPVF-S
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/21/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/20/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured12/02/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age80 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight110 KG
-
-