• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. SFXSPI PDS+ UNI VIO 12IN 3-0 SA PS-2 PR; SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. SFXSPI PDS+ UNI VIO 12IN 3-0 SA PS-2 PR; SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SXPP1B104
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Purulent Discharge (1812); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pocket Erosion (2013)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.D4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: the patient was 6 years old.Due to osteochondrosis, there were signs of infection with pus discharge from the right wrist and right ankle.Because an implant was present, the sutures were removed.The wound was then sutured using vcp 3-0 and pdp 4-0, and aquacel was applied.The patient made a full recovery.The doctor commented that the 3-0 suture might have been too thick for a pediatric patient.In addition, since there have been two infection cases and three cases of suture protrusion in succession, the doctor would like to know the cause.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.What is the surgeon¿s experience with this stratafix suture? please provide the patient's demographic information including age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure.Date and name of index surgical procedure? the diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? were any concomitant procedures performed? what was the initial approach for the index surgical procedure? (open, laparoscopic or other)? on what tissue was the suture used? what was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? for the original intended closure, how were all layers closed? was the fixation loop secured to tissue at the initiation of suture use during the index procedure? was at least one reverse stitch performed prior to closure? please describe the patient manifestations of the reported infection (location, severity, appearance).Please provide the onset date/time of infection from the initial surgical procedure.Were there any pre-existing signs/symptoms of active infection prior to this surgical procedure? did the patient receive any prophylactic antibiotics pre-, intra- or post-operation? were cultures and sensitivities performed? if so, please provide the results.How much and what type of drainage is present in this wound? please describe any medical intervention performed including medication name and results.Were any pre-op cleansing procedures changed recently? if yes, please describe did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? other relevant patient history/concomitant medications? what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? what is the patient's current status? lot number? attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.On note a-14871809 is reported "since there have been two infection cases and three cases of suture protrusion in succession, the doctor would like to know the cause." so, the complaints (b)(4) captures only one case of suture protrusion.(b)(4) captures only one case of infection.Could you please confirm whether, for the two infection cases, complaint (b)(4) corresponds to case 1 and (b)(4) corresponds to case 2, or if it is necessary to create an additional complaint? could you please also confirm whether it is necessary to create two additional complaints for suture protrusion?.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown orthopedic surgery on an unknown date and a barbed suture was used for dermal suturing.Post-op, due to osteochondrosis, there were signs of infection with pus discharge from the right wrist and right ankle.Because an implant was present, the sutures were removed.The wound was then sutured with different sutures and aquacel was applied.The patient made a full recovery.The doctor commented that the 3-0 suture might have been too thick for a pediatric patient.Additional information was requested.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information: h6 health effect - clinical code.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: we received information from the sales rep that the three cases of protrusion are as follows: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: "since there have been two infection cases and three cases of suture protrusion in succession, the doctor would like to know the cause." so, the complaints, (b)(4) captures one case of infection.(b)(4) captures one case of infection.(b)(4)captures only one case of suture protrusion.Therefor the following complaints has been created to capture the 2 additional cases of protrusion.(b)(4) case 2 protrusion.(b)(4) case 3 protrusion.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint: (b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: this event is one of three cases of suture protrusion.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SFXSPI PDS+ UNI VIO 12IN 3-0 SA PS-2 PR
Common Device Name
SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
1000 route 202
raritan NJ 08869
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.-SAN LORENZO PR
road 183, km 8.3
san lorenzo PR 00754
Manufacturer Contact
orla o'mahony
1000 route 202
raritan, NJ 08869
3035526892
MDR Report Key24421306
Report Number2210968-2026-01879
Device Sequence Number18783986
Product Code NEW
UDI-Device Identifier10705031236240
UDI-Public10705031236240
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K182873
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/06/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberSXPP1B104
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/05/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/18/2026
03/02/2026
03/18/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/23/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/27/2026
03/13/2026
04/06/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age6 YR
Patient SexUnknown
-
-