|
Block b3: approximated based on the date the manufacturer became aware of the event.Additional suspect medical device component involved in the event: product family: scs-linear leads, model: sc-2352-70, serial: (b)(6), batch: 7085755, upn: m365sc2352700, udi: (b)(4).Product family: scs-linear leads, model: sc-2366-70, serial: (b)(6), batch: 7077978, upn: m365sc2366700, udi: (b)(4).Product family: scs-linear leads, model: sc-2366-70, serial: (b)(6), batch: 7077944, upn: m365sc2366700, udi: (b)(4).Product family: scs-ipg-r-mri, model: sc-1232, serial: (b)(6), batch: 805174, upn: m365sc12320, udi: (b)(4).
|
|
It was reported that the incision site of the patient would not heal well due to an infection that had developed.The patient was hospitalized and was provided a course of antibiotics, wound wash and wound vacuum.The patient underwent a spinal cord stimulator (scs) explant procedure, was doing well postoperatively and had recovered.The explanted devices were disposed of by the facility.
|
|
Block b3: approximated based on the date the manufacturer became aware of the event.Additional suspect medical device component involved in the event: product family: scs-linear leads.Model: sc-2352-70.Serial: (b)(6).Batch: (b)(6).Upn: m365sc2352700.Udi: (b)(4).Product family: scs-linear leads.Model: sc-2366-70.Serial: (b)(6).Batch: (b)(6).Upn: m365sc2366700.Udi: (b)(4).Product family: scs-linear leads.Model: sc-2366-70.Serial: (b)(6).Batch: (b)(6).Upn: m365sc2366700.Udi: (b)(4).Product family: scs-ipg-r-mri.Model: sc-1232.Serial: (b)(6).Batch: (b)(6).Upn: m365sc12320.Udi: (b)(4).Investigation results: the device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.Good faith effort attempts were made to try and retrieve the device, however response was not received.Device history record: it was confirmed this device met manufacturing specification prior to distribution and there were no manufacturing deviations which could have contributed to the reported event.Labeling review: review of the instructions for use (ifu) confirmed there was relevant content and sufficient guidance with respect to the circumstances described within this complaint.No updates are required to the ifu as a result of this event.Investigation conclusion: based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of known inherent risk of device.
|
|
It was reported that the incision site of the patient would not heal well due to an infection that had developed.The patient was hospitalized and was provided a course of antibiotics, wound wash and wound vacuum.The patient underwent a spinal cord stimulator (scs) explant procedure, was doing well postoperatively and had recovered.The explanted devices were disposed of by the facility.
|