• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COCHLEAR BONE ANCHORED SOLUTIONS AB BIM400 IMPLANT MAGNET; COCHLEAR BAHA ATTRACT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COCHLEAR BONE ANCHORED SOLUTIONS AB BIM400 IMPLANT MAGNET; COCHLEAR BAHA ATTRACT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 93550
Medical Device Problem Codes Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Pain (1994); Discomfort (2330)
Date of Event 01/13/2026
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported adverse event is associated with a returned device; however, the provided clinical information was reviewed by the manufacturer and no specific device analysis is deemed necessary at this time.Previous product examinations have not showed any relationship between a product geometrical deviation and the reported clinical complication.Additionally, there are no indications that a product failure has contributed to the reported issue.Transient pain is a known medical complication where most cases can be resolved with clinical case management.Known reasons for cause of pain are abnormal skin sensitivity, earlier trauma to the implanted area, lack of adequate bone quality or other generalized diseases.It might also be due to a loose implant magnet, causing pain around the implanted area when using the baha sound processor.
 
Event or Problem Description
Per the clinic, the patient experienced pain at the magnet site.The patient wore a soft pad to achieve adequate retention; however, the patient continued to experience discomfort and pain due to the tightness and strength of the magnet connection to the implant.A reduced-strength magnet did not provide adequate retention.Due to the pain, the patient was unable to wear the processor for extended periods of time.The patient also reported discomfort with sound quality in noisy environments and excessive acoustic feedback from the processor.Subsequently, the internal magnet was explanted under general anesthesia on (b)(6) 2026 and the patient was re-implanted with another cochlear device during the same surgery.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIM400 IMPLANT MAGNET
Common Device Name
COCHLEAR BAHA ATTRACT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
COCHLEAR BONE ANCHORED SOLUTIONS AB
konstruktionsvägen 14
mölnlycke, 435 3 3
SW  435 33
Manufacturer (Section G)
COCHLEAR BONE ANCHORED SOLUTIONS AB
konstruktionsvägen 14
mölnlycke, 435 3 3
SW   435 33
Manufacturer Contact
dini aziz
unit ug-1, vertical podium
no. 8 jalan kerinchi
kuala lumpur, wilayah persekutuan 59200
MY   59200
MDR Report Key24442062
Report Number6000034-2026-00671
Device Sequence Number10364001
Product Code LXB
UDI-Device Identifier09321502025294
UDI-Public(01)09321502025294(10)110452(17)210211
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateVA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K131240
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Device Explanted Year2026
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 02/25/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/11/2021
Device Model Number93550
Device Catalogue Number93550
Device Lot Number110452
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/18/2026
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/31/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/25/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age54 YR
Patient SexUnknown
-
-