|
H11: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed, and this lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause for the reported failure to fire issue could not be determined based upon the provided information.It is unknown whether patient and/or procedural issues contributed to the reported event.(b)(4) was initiated to address the increase in maxcore complaints regarding the firing problem and failure to fire.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.Section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
A patient underwent ultrasound guided kidney biopsy procedure through normal tissue density using maxcore device.During the procedure, it was reported that the device allegedly failed to fire.The device was primed as normal however, when they attempted to fire it using the bottom trigger first, it was failed.No coaxial needle was used.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|