|
This report is being submitted to corrected data, and to relay additional information and device evaluation.Correction: d4, device catalog number was submitted incorrectly as tsx41b11.Correct device catalog number is tsx47b11.Additionally, the device lot information has been corrected to 2120035838.The following sections are being reported: b4: date of this report was updated.D4: device catalog number was updated.D4: device lot information was updated.D9: device availability and return date were updated.G3: date received by manufacturer was updated.G6: type of report was updated.H2: type of follow up was updated.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer was updated.H6: type of investigation code was added: 10, 4109, 3331 and 4111.H6: investigation findings code was added: 213.H6: investigation conclusions code was added: 4315.H11: narrative/data was updated.Zimvie received the reported device for evaluation.Visual evaluation of the as returned device identified the implant's packaging was not returned in its sealed packaging outer box.The implant's outer vial tamper seal was observed broken.The outer vial was empty.Functional testing to recreate the reported event could not be performed due to the nature of the device and event.This complaint refers to the specific device being investigated for this complaint record.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number for similar events and no other complaint was identified.The customer did submit one image for the reported event.Based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation is improper handling of devices/packaging outside of zimvie control.Therefore, based on the available information, a packaging malfunction could not be verified.The reported event/coob was non-verifiable since the condition of the product/packaging received by the customer was unknown/non-verifiable.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|