|
|
| Model Number |
DIU375 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare (1487); Operating System Becomes Nonfunctional (2996)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/26/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section a2, a3a, a3b, a4, a5 and a6: not applicable, as there was no patient contact with the device.Section d6a, if implanted, give date: not applicable as the iol was not implanted.Section d6b, if explanted, give date: not applicable as the iol was not implanted.Therefore, not explanted.Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a preloaded monofocal toric intraocular lens (iol) was damaged during surgery.The lens did not come into contact with the patient.The reported issue involved a bent plunger and an injector pen that was unable to turn.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: feb 19, 2026.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection revealed that the handpiece was received with the plunger rod overriding the lens stuck in the cartridge.Viscoelastic residue was observed throughout the cartridge.The cartridge tip was bent.No issues were identified with the lens module, device assembly, and plunger rod advancement.The plunger was observed to be slightly bent.The lens could not be removed from the cartridge; however, the lens was observed to be damaged.The complaint issues of ¿plunger rod issue¿ and ¿lens damaged¿ were identified during product evaluation, while the complaint issue of ¿difficult to use¿ was not identified during the evaluation.The observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Conclusion: based on the investigation, no malfunction or product deficiency was identified.Corrected data: in review, it was noticed that the justification for the absence of the ¿first/given name¿ field in section e1 was inadvertently not addressed in section h11 of the initial mdr report.This information has now been captured in this supplemental mdr report.The following field has been updated accordingly: section e1: initial reporter first name: unknown, information not provided.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|