• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number DRT225
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Blurred Vision (2137); Visual Impairment (2138)
Date of Event 06/26/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a4: weight: unknown/ requested but not provided.Section a5: ethnicity: unknown/ requested but not provided.Section a6: race: unknown/ requested but not provided.Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation as it was discarded; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, the information has not been provided.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that preoperatively patient¿s right eye (od) had a refraction of -1.00+2.00×167 with a bscva of 20/25-2 and the intended target refraction was plano.Patient had clear lens exchange and a preloaded toric iol was implanted.After that initial implantation the postoperative refraction measured -0.25 sphere with a bscva of20/30, but the patient reported persistent blurry vision that never improved and interfered with daily activities such as driving.Because the visual disturbance persisted and the patient had lost two or more lines of bscva (despite not being overcorrected or undercorrected), the toric iol was explanted and replaced with a different, non¿johnson & johnson lens.Following the lens exchange the postoperative refraction was-0.75+0.50×120and the patient reported better vision.The explanted lens was discarded and unavailable for return.No preexisting conditions affecting lens calculation were noted, no unplanned intraoperative interventions (such as vitrectomy, incision enlargement, or sutures) were required, no additional medications beyond standard of care were used, no further surgical procedures were planned, and no further information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key24465143
Report Number3012236936-2026-000051
Device Sequence Number18481812
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474811959
UDI-Public(01)05050474811959(17)271004
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 02/27/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDRT225
Device Catalogue NumberDRT2250205
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/03/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/26/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured10/04/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-