• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CONVATEC DOMINICAN REPUBLIC INC DUODERM; DRESSING,WOUND,OCCLUSIVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CONVATEC DOMINICAN REPUBLIC INC DUODERM; DRESSING,WOUND,OCCLUSIVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 187644
Medical Device Problem Codes Device Damaged Prior to Use (2284); Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging (2385)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
The distributor notified that outer box dented and damaged.However, as per photographs received, primary pack appeared damaged and torn.The product was not used.Photographs depicting the issue were received from the complainant.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device 2 of 4.E1: complainant street address: (b)(6).Based on the available information, this event is deemed to be a reportable malfunction.Batch record review: lot: 4h01392 was manufactured on 08/23/2024, in bopack line, with a total of (b)(4) market units (mkus).The complaints engineer performed a batch record review on 26/feb/2026, to verify if all the applicable procedures were followed and no issues were found; all the components for assembly were correct per bill of materials (bom) and all the tooling information documented was also correct, system application product (sap) material identification (id): 1704758 and manufacturing order: (b)(4).Review of the batch record showed that all relevant tests required during the manufacturing process and final product release had been fulfilled and met the requirements.No discrepancy related to this issue was found within the documentation.The reported malfunction could be generated during the manufacturing process of the final line, therefore no further batch record review of the subassembly lots was required.Photograph, video and/or physical sample evaluation: there were photographs associated with this case and in these, the reported defect can be seen.No unused return sample was expected.Historical complaints review: on 26/feb/2026, complaints engineer ran a query in database in order to verify the complaints reported for the 4h01392 lot for the malfunction ¿primary pack (sterile products) is torn, ripped or contains holes.¿ defect and no additional complaints were identified.Historical nonconformance review: on 26/feb/2026, complaints engineer ran a query in database looking for any in process nonconformance / corrective and preventive actions (capa) (s) associated to the malfunction ¿primary pack (sterile products) is torn, ripped or contains holes.¿ defect for the lot number: 4h01392 and as result, no nonconformance / corrective and preventive actions (capa) (s) for this malfunction were generated during the manufacturing process of the referenced lot.Current quality controls: based on the process instruction (pi), the following tests are performed in the manufacturing lines, in order to identify this failure mode in our manufacturing process: test methods (tm) "sterile packaging inspection for nonconformities - visual attributes": frequency: every 30 minutes.Sample quantity: 1 market unit or nlt 5 blisters.Acceptance criteria: accept = 0| reject = 1.Defect rate analysis: there have been 4 defective parts confirmed to date from a lot size of (b)(4) products.This represents a defect rate of only (b)(4), which is well within an appropriate acceptable quality level (aql) for this defect which should be 0.25% based on our test methods (tm).In addition, all of the in-process testing on this lot did not find a single defective unit, which confirms that the lot is unlikely to breach an acceptable quality level (aql) of 0.25.To date, it is well within our accepted acceptable quality level (aql) level for this type of failure mode or defect.Conclusion: a review of batch records was completed and showed that all relevant tests required during the manufacturing process and final product release had been fulfilled and met the requirements.No discrepancies related to this issue were found within the documentation.This issue will be monitored through the post market product monitoring review process, standard operating procedure (sop).To date no additional information has been received.Should additional information become available, a follow-up report will be submitted.Fda registration number: reporting site: 1049092, manufacturing site: 9618003.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DUODERM
Common Device Name
DRESSING,WOUND,OCCLUSIVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CONVATEC DOMINICAN REPUBLIC INC
km 18.5 parque industrial
itabo, s.a. haina
san cristobal 91000
DR  91000
Manufacturer (Section G)
CONVATEC DOMINICAN REPUBLIC INC
km 18.5 parque industrial
itabo, s.a. haina
san cristobal 91000
DR   91000
Manufacturer Contact
pamela meadows
7815 national service road
suite 600
greensboro, NC 27409
3365424679
MDR Report Key24481213
Report Number9618003-2026-00465
Device Sequence Number10230225
Product Code NAD
UDI-Device Identifier00768455174751
UDI-Public00768455174751
Combination Product (Y/N)N
PMA/510(K) Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 02/09/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Other
Device Model Number187644
Device Lot Number4H01392
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/09/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/02/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured08/23/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-